Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Above left: Leica 10-25mm at 10mm f2.8. Above right: Leica 8-18mm at 10mm f3.2. 100% crops from centre
Above: Place the Olympus on the left and the Leica 10-25 on the right, both at 25mm and their respective maximum apertures and unsurprisingly the latter is delivering larger blobs at f1.7, albeit almost all of them rendered as ovals until the aperture is closed to f2.8 or smaller. I’d also say the style of the Leica 10-25 blobs isn’t particularly smooth or outline-free here either. I pointed out that if he could prove that he had bees discriminated against because of a spent conviction he could make a complaint, but it could be hard to prove.They refused to offer him work because their contract required them to only offer up drivers who had a “clean licence”
Other conduct constituting an offence for which a driving disqualification has been imposed by the State of Offence Also because of that 2.5x crop factor, it means that you are only sampling a very small sensor area. FF sensors are 864 mm For example, code LC20 (driving otherwise than in accordance with a licence) becomes code LC22 on your driving record if you have helped someone to do this. Causing or permitting offences Above: Ok now for coverage, starting at the wide-end of each lens, so here’s the Olympus 8-25mm at 8mm, where it delivered essentially the same field of view as the Leica DG 8-18mm at 8mm. Don’t always assume lenses that quote the same focal length actually capture the same field of view as there can be variations. Meanwhile the outer edge of the red frame represents the slightly tighter coverage of the 10-25 at 10mm, so you can see how much more 8mm will get you. Wilful failure to carry out the obligation placed on driver after being involved in a road accident (hit or run)
Intro
As the clubman version of the DG-30, the Stilo DG-10 utilizes a single digital circuit to provide superior sound at a more affordable price. It also offers the same advanced noise cancelling technology with three different levels to accommodate the noise of your rally car, enabling vastly improved communications to the driver. Above left: Leica 10-25mm at 18mm f16. Above right: Leica 8-18mm at 18mm f16. 100% crops from centre Causing or likely to cause danger by reason of use of unsuitable vehicle or using a vehicle with parts or accessories (excluding brakes, steering or tyres) in a dangerous condition Failure to provide a specimen for analysis in circumstances other than driving or attempting to drive It shows disqualification under ‘totting-up’ - if the total of penalty points reaches 12 or more within 3 years, the driver can be disqualified. Theft or unauthorised taking
Above: Moving into the far corner, there’s a minor drop in sharpness, but still respectable quality at the maximum aperture. Closing the aperture gradually to f11 didn’t make any significant difference in this particular test, so the Olympus was performing at its best pretty much out of the gate. I also retested with the focusing area repositioned from the centre to the corner and the results were the same. Above: Moving out to the corner and again the longer focal length of the Leica on the right means I’m showing a different part of the pier, but from roughly the same part of the entire frame. With the Leica wide-open to f1.7, there’s quite obvious darkening in the corners due to vignetting. This mostly disappears by f2.8 and at f4 the lens benefits from a mild boost in corner sharpness. I found it improved more at f5.6, but didn’t benefit if I was focused in the corner rather than the middle. Each endorsement has a special code and is given ‘penalty points’ on a scale from 1 to 11. You get more points for more serious offences. HOWEVER, the endorsement is still there for the 11 years and may well possibly affect job prospects if the licence details are viewed. This is very much a grey area of law as an employer cannot discriminate against you for a 'spent' conviction as they have no legal right to know about it. Having seen it on a licence they are supposed to ignore it, but it's difficult to unsee something you have seen!! Above: Next, let’s return to the middle of the Olympus 8-25mm image at 8mm f4 on the left and compare it against the middle of the Leica DG 10-25mm on the right at 10mm f1.7. Since that lens starts a little longer, the crop on the right shows a slightly smaller area, but looking at the sharpness of details, I’d say the Leica is looking pretty good out of the gate at f1.7. Indeed when concentrating in the middle, there’s little benefit to closing this lens down.Refusing to give permission for analysis of a blood sample that was taken without consent due to incapacity in circumstances other than driving or attempting to drive
Codes BA40 and BA60 must stay on a driving record for 4 years from the date of the conviction. CodeSince October 2020, even multiple offences can be filtered, unless they are not eligible for filtering. Aptamer-based colorimetric detection of the DNA damage marker 8-oxo-dG using cysteamine-stabilised gold nanoparticles Above: Next here’s the Leica DG 10-25 at 10mm f1.7 on the EM1 Mark II using sensor shift IBIS only and the first thing you’ll notice is the shallower depth of field – and lower noise – thanks to the f1.7 aperture, but while there’s less warping than the Olympus at 8mm, there’s still some visible in the corners. Choose IBIS with extra digital stabilisation and you’ll again crop the image a little. This time any warping has been essentially eliminated, although now the field of view is looking a little tight for handheld vlogging. Above left: Leica 10-25mm at 10mm f11. Above right: Leica 8-18mm at 10mm f11. 100% crops from corner
Great Deal 
New Comment