Blowing up Russia: The Book that Got Litvinenko Murdered

Product Information

Some of the arguments Goldfarb used to prove that the Kremlin was behind the killing were debunked by evidence presented at the inquiry, though his overall conclusion was confirmed. You can’t help but start looking at your food, drinks, phone reception in different ways while reading this!

Ever since I had known him, he had seized every opportunity to blacken the hated name of Vladimir Putin. Oligarchs come and go in the Putin court – the mighty can become mightier (and richer) and can fall quickly, lose everything, including their lives. It may therefore be true that Litvinenko had been the instigator of the contacts with Lugovoy and Kovtun and that he was indeed seeking their help in digging the dirt on some Russian businesses.An eye opening not just the murder of Litvinenko but an insight to Russian secret services and the West in not understanding Putin. Robert Service, Professor of Russian History Oxford University, Sunday Times --This text refers to the paperback edition.

What a damning book on the running of present day Russia, and worryingly it also affects us in the UK.As we will discover, Litvinenko challenged Vladimir Putin in the most bizarre circumstances; Putin rebuffed him, and Sasha felt slighted. A vitally important book co-written by Alexander Litvinenko, the victim of polonium poisoning at the hand of Putin’s agents, and Russian expatriate historian Yuri Felshtinsky. As Litvinenko is now dead and his widow professes herself completely ignorant of his business dealings there is no one to challenge Lugovoy’s version of the phone conversation that took place after breakfast that day. His famous article, “Russian Venom”, was published by The Wall Street Journal on 22 November 2006 correctly describing the then unknown substance that would kill Sasha hours later as a radioactive poison before anyone, even experts from the UK Atomic Weapons Establishment were able to identify it as Polonium-210. In a boiling fury Berezovsky had fled to London and appeared to have devoted his life to an obsessive quest for revenge.

The contrast between the banal interior of court 73 in London’s Royal Courts of Justice, and the shocking evidence we heard, was bewildering. To understand how he died I set out to retrace his steps, and from sources close to the events in question I have constructed a detailed picture of who did what and who went where. Further atrocities, including the blowing-up of ordinary apartments, mainly in Moscow, occupied by innocent Russians served as a pretext for the Second Chechen War (1999 to 2000). But in the course of a few turbulent weeks in 1998 he was transformed from a Putin ultra-loyalist to an acrimonious, diehard foe. Today, Lugovoy is coy about revealing too many details, but he says Litvinenko was involved in providing information and services to several British companies interested in investing in Russia.As an old Russia hand and an habitué of Russian exile circles in London, I knew who he was and that he was closely associated with the kingpin of the exiles, Boris Berezovsky. She disputed the account of Sasha’s alleged deathbed conversion and had wanted a non-denominational service. Sasha Litvinenko was Berezovsky’s lieutenant in a bitter propaganda campaign against Putin and his regime. Such an obvious thing was suddenly discovered by a simple old man from Milwaukee, and he’s got a point there. It was a special day for him and for his wife: it was six years ago to the day, on 1 November 2000, that they had arrived in England with their young son Anatoly.

Andrei Sakharov’s emotional leave-taking in 1989, when weeping thousands lined the streets of Moscow; the murdered Russian mafiosnik whose burial party I saw decimated by a graveside bomb . Le Figaro» спросила бывшего секретаря Совета безопасности России Александра Лебедя: возможно ли, что Российское правительство организовало террористические акции против своих граждан? He has also published works on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and American whistleblower Edward Snowden. In a sequel, Litvinenko Murder Case Solved, Dunkerley exposes how the UK government tried to paper over what really happened.In fact, he was far braver than I imagined – using his final days to provide the police with as much evidence of the events that had led him to his terrible, and unusual, death. A man who was trying to provide for his family, having fled his country and moved to London to start a new life. The author was a journalist in Russia in the early years of Putin's governance and he tells how his apartment, like most other foreigners, was bugged and how Russian agents made "visits" when he and his family were not there. To judge Sir Robert Owen appointed to hold the inquest “into the death of a Russian Spy” as the BBC and other media has put it – a terrible mistake. No wonder, we live in an information-rich world when the wealth of information means a dearth of something else: a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes.