Aside from this and their roughly identical density, everything about the MX-4 and NT-H1 are different.

MX-4 | Premium Performance Thermal Paste | ARCTIC MX-4 | Premium Performance Thermal Paste | ARCTIC

This leads to extremely high thermal conductivity, guaranteeing that heat is dissipated quickly and efficiently from the CPU or GPU. Despite the seemingly astronomical viscosity figure, the new paste claims to be very easy to apply, and it looks pretty ordinary in the application demo video seen below. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page.

The Kryonaut thermal paste is a mildly viscous thermal compound with good stability, making it simple to work with and use. So even if you’re an experienced user, you’d want to know a thing or two about the viscosity of a paste before you apply it. Understanding the viscosity involved can also help to determine whether you’ve squeezed out the right amount of paste or not.

ARCTIC MX-4 (incl. Spatula, 4 g) - Premium Performance

Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! Overall, our team will recommend the MX4, as we believe it is best for those who want a safe, budget-friendly, and reliable solution.Got a ton of different answers but OCN was all about CoolerMaster Gel, Thermalright, and Thermal Grizzly. Depending on personal preference and area of application, a thinner or thicker thermal compound may be preferred. I had mx-6 and mx-4, didnt notice any differences tbh, afterwards i switched to thermal grizzly for sake of testing it, their paste is more dense and not so much wet as mx-4 or mx-6 and in my case i could change it once in 3-4 years if i wanted to, however when changing my luube, i take blocks apart to clean em, and if you do that, then you kinda have to put new one.